
Pictured above is me committing a common error. When I try to input channel 55, my finger sometimes lingers too long on the “5” button, resulting in channel 555. But there is no channel 555. I know that, but my TV doesn’t. So now I have to wait about ten seconds for my TV to search for a non-existent channel, then give me the “No Signal” screen.
Isn’t it about time that television manufacturers redesign their *#@!ing TV remotes? Inputting the correct channel is a bitch, with those sticky, teeny-tiny buttons. I’m tired of messing up, then missing the first part of a show while trying to get the remote to cooperate.
I’m no electronic engineer. But really, would it be that hard to design a TV remote with an “Undo” or “Backspace” button? Let’s say you try to input channel 7. But you’re not quite nimble enough and accidentally input channel 777777777777777777777777777777777777. Rather than having to wait ten seconds for the TV to search for something that everyone and God knows ain’t there, wouldn’t it be nice to hit an “Undo” button and start all over?
And what about those buttons anyway? Why do they repeat numbers so easily? Couldn’t that be fixed too?
While the engineers are busy with my redesign ideas, here’s another request: Make the buttons a bit larger. I’m not asking for much real estate here. Just make the buttons approximate the size of the average man’s fingertip. Ladies have an advantage here, because their fingertips tend to be closer to the size of those buttons. But this can be a real problem for men when we’re trying to switch around to different ball games, with a drink in one hand and a thumb fumbling over the remote with the other.
If humans can land a spacecraft on a speeding comet, I’m sure they can make a better TV remote. And think of how much cumulative time would be saved, across the country, if everyone had better functioning TV remotes. Why, that time could be used for interacting with other family members, or working on our tax returns. Yes, consider how much more our country could collect in taxes if they’d only fix the dad-blamed TV remote.
Write to your congressional representative. Or have a heart-to-heart with any inventors you know. Together, it’s at least remotely possible we can start a national movement that will eliminate, once and for all, the dreaded “No Signal” screen.
Categories: Humor
The world is driven by Commerce … and Commerce is driven by the most lucrative market sector … and we (you and I) are not in that sector. That is why we don’t understand the current popular music; we shake our heads at the way household appliances are being designed/developed; we don’t understand the latest electronics (I am having a love/hate relationship with a 2020 Toyota) etc. etc.
I can remember my Grandmother waving to the people on the TV (“Of course they can see me. They’re waving to me!” I can remember my Dad trying to figure out a Sony Walkman. I can remember so many elderly people who were losing touch with the world, and fondly remembered simpler times. Will all that in mind, I must also remember that I (and you) are now in that same age range that they were!
Good luck with your remote, because I doubt the manufacturers will listen to some cranky “old bugger”. 🙂
LikeLiked by 4 people
I think the 18 to 35 age group is what the tech industry generally markets to. So we are SOL.
That’s funny about your grandma.
I wonder if the manufacturers would listen to me if I threw my remote through the TV screen. No, probably not.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The American consumer has spoken and he/she does not want good products, he/she wants cheap products delivered to his/her door seconds before they order it.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Isn’t it ironic. Those same people probably do not approve of so much being manufactured outside of the US, and yet will not pay the resulting higher prices if manufacturing is brought back into the US! Of course they might agree to take a pay cut in order to keep the prices down…… NOT!
It reminds me of the “Greek syndrome” – Nobody wants to pay taxes, but everybody wants Govt. services! We know where that got Greece! 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
I think we’re heading down the same road as Greece. Which I presume would be a slippery slope. The attitude seems to be that money grows on trees. So the government must spend, spend, more and more, but never raise taxes
LikeLike
Which makes me question whether the education system is doing all it could. A “back to basics” re democracy, politics and the inherent financial obligations would not be amiss!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think so. Although the teachers have to know the material first, before they can teach it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, both parties are for limited government spending. One side wants to limit spending on the military but really nothing else and the other side wants to limit spending on everything but the military.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Your grasp of politics is uncanny.
LikeLike
“Cheap” isn’t even the operative word to justify crappy products anymore. As long as it’s trendy, Americans will pay full price for mass-produced, disposable junk.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yes, they don’t make stuff to last anymore just to throw away and buy new again.
LikeLiked by 3 people
That’s true, it can be hard to find good quality anything. Most stuff is just mediocre. The super-rich must have their own secret catalog they order from.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My TV has a trendy newfangled motion-sensitive remote that makes a floating pointer appear on the screen… that causes all kinds of incomprehensible menus to pop up every time I touch the thing. I must be old and out of touch. I still want buttons.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Damn, what brand is it? I’ll be sure to avoid that TV at all costs. My technologically-challenged wife would never be able to figure it out, and I’d go insane trying to fix it for her, every 5 minutes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s an “LG”. I don’t watch much TV… the only thing it gets is whatever’s free through an Amazon “Fire Stick” connected to my WiFi. Fortunately, that also means I don’t have to touch the TV remote for anything other than changing the volume.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t watch much TV, either. And I don’t think we’re missing much.
LikeLiked by 2 people
You’re missing so much?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been known to come up missing. But not much.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha! So many good shows.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m afraid those “good” shows may corrupt my pure mind.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pfft! Pure mind…Whatever.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Why don’t you just pick one channel and watch whatever is on it?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do. It’s the channel my wife is watching.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A true diplomat! Cannot understand why you’re not into politics. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
As crazy as I am, I’m too sane to be a politician.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We have a handy button that you can push and say out loud what channel you want. Thats the kind you need. 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
And how many misunderstandings does that lead to, between you and the TV?
LikeLike
Not too many. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmm, that’s good. Perhaps this is technology that would work well in the Gnu home.
LikeLike
I think it might! If only everything on it was voice activated. The DVD player remote drives me crazy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seems there’s a remote control for just about everything electronic these days. I prefer manual buttons for most things. How lazy are we supposed to be?
LikeLiked by 1 person
How about “Alexa” put channel — on.
And there are remotes that have bigger buttons.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I tried that, but my husband still wouldn’t respond.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Buttons not big enough obviously! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
Lol!
LikeLiked by 2 people
I don’t like the idea of computers listening to me. And I don’t care if she has a sexy name like Alexa.
I think I’ve seen such remotes. You have to buy them from third party vendors.
LikeLiked by 2 people
What people just don’t seem to be getting, is that if you have a speaker/mic in the house (let’s call it Gladys), and if she is awaiting your every wish … then she is listening for as long as she is turned on. That means that she “hears” everything! Now just imagine some techie moron who finds a way of tapping into “Gladys” and records everything she hears. I’ve heard of people who have the speaker/mic in their bedroom just so she can turn lights on/off! Just wait until those recordings are offered for sale (or not, if a ransom is met). 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
I’ve found that his has been my experience with women. They only listen when turned on. To make Alexa realistic, they should have her gabbing away, a mile a minute, just as soon as she’s turned off.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeh! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
“No comment!”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hee-hee.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hence the whole point of big buttons!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hmm, there seems to be a double entendre hidden away in this comment.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Whole points on buttons sound dangerous to me.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m really not sure what buttons anyone is talking about, and I hope I never find out.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I get that. Yes I think you do.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I’m not sure about whose hands they used to measure the remotes… but I do remember my aunt gifted my grandma with larger than normal remote controls so they can see the numbers better. A button’s size is approximately half the size of a regular iphone.
Perhaps man can design better tv remotes.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They do have larger remotes, but you have to buy them separate, and then figure out how to program them for your TV. And they don’t have all the functions of the remote that came with the TV. But I like the idea of bigger buttons.
LikeLiked by 1 person
let’s just go back to the days before remotes, and everyone would have to walk over to their tv and change the dial to go to a different station. just imagine how much fitter would be…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, the average TV viewer would probably lose a pound a day, from all that walking.
LikeLiked by 1 person
and think of how much they would lose in a year then…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Could almost get them down to normal weight.
LikeLiked by 1 person
😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ah yes ….. the days when we had 3 Channels to choose from, and one of those was non-commercial! Only 3 Channels? Yes … but there was no duplication of programming that I recall! 🙂
LikeLiked by 2 people
You got 3 channels? You lucky bastard.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed we were! When we came to Canada, we were amazed at how many channels were available, and so disappointed that all those channels offered pretty much the same as our original 3 … but with lots of duplication! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
That seems like a redundant waste of resources.
LikeLike
Yes I would agree, but that is the beauty (????) of the free enterprise system. Anybody can startup a business and compete if they are so inclined. In the case of repetitive TV programming, many companies seem to be able to survive with showing the same as the competition, so I must assume that perhaps it is the timing of the programs that allow multiple companies to share the viewer market base?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Could be. In most businesses, location is everything. But in broadcasting, timing seems to be the key.
LikeLiked by 1 person
we had VHF and UHF channels, for maybe a total of six…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wow! 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person