
Sometimes, Covid restrictions are criticized as being ridiculous, idiotic, tyrannical, and completely unnecessary. But let’s face it, we can’t stop dictators from being dictators. And the 50 dictators who govern the United States seem to wield unchecked and far-reaching power at making rules for how we go about our personal lives.
When one is faced with such overwhelming force, the most effective weapon of resistance is what I call, Passive-Aggressive Suckup. Or PASSUP, for short. PASSUP resistors openly praise the strictures imposed upon them (the Suckup part of their strategy). But then they go off and sneakily do their own thing anyway (the Passive-Aggressive part of their strategy).
For instance, suppose you praised the Thanksgiving celebration restrictions recently imposed, such as, no gatherings greater than 6, 8, 10, 12, or whatever a governor determined based upon whatever scientist that governor consulted with. And no loud talking or singing. And keep your masks on and windows open. But then you held a large Thanksgiving feast anyway, with loud, boisterous relatives, room-to-room wassailing, and maskless diners, within a closed-up, snugly heated home.
If you did this, you were behaving just like a PASSUP.
Don’t feel ashamed. Many of us have become PASSUPs these days. I’ve noticed that many of those who advocate masks, and all forms of social distancing, have a tendency to violate those rules, right and left.
Maybe that’s because there are so many different rules, it all gets confusing. The problem is, we have so many different scientists saying so many different things about Covid, and so many different governors consulting with so many different scientists, that we’ve been left with a transcontinental hodgepodge of rules and restrictions, that morph into odd varieties with each state border crossing.
Here in California, Governor Newsom recently issued something that I call the One-Night Stand Ban. This bizarre diktat forbids people from different households from congregating together between the hours of 10:00 pm and 5:00 am. I guess some scientist must have told the governor that Covid has been spreading via all-night orgies and dates with strangers.
Some states have closed restaurants. Others only require them to close at around 10:00 pm. I guess the scientists in those states have determined that Covid spreads more readily in restaurants, after 10:00 pm. What is it about 10:00 pm, anyway? Does Covid get bigger and badder as we approach the witching hour?
Some state scientists don’t allow gyms to be open. Others allow them to open their doors at limited capacity, such as 10%, or 25%, or whatever the scientific opinion happens to be in that locale.
In some states, scientists are apparently telling governors that it’s okay to keep schools open. But in other states, the scientists tell the governors to shut the schools down. But the scientists who run the federal government have never told schools to shut down.
Masks aren’t required in states like Arizona and Florida. But the scientists in other states have agreed that masks are so effective they should be mandatory. Presumptive President-Elect Biden also agrees with these scientists, and says he will make them mandatory nationwide. But current President Trump has been listening to different scientists, who are telling him not to make masks mandatory.
Scientists in some states, such as Hawaii and New York, won’t allow people in from other states, unless they quarantine or test negative. Scientists in other states, such as California, have never imposed such a quarantine requirement. However, California scientists do “advise” that you quarantine. We took that wise advise under advisement, when we recently returned from a trip to Nevada. But we didn’t follow it. That’s the PASSUP way.
I feel proud to be a PASSUP. There’s no shame in sucking up, and then doing your own thing. After all, many of our top government officials are PASSUPs, too. For instance, Governor Newsom, along with two senior officials from the California Medical Association, were recently caught attending a birthday dinner with 12 other people. But indoor dining, in the few places in California where our scientists still allow it, is limited to only 6 people.
Governor Newsom apologized, while innocently claiming that the dining was done outdoors. But then photos emerged showing the dining was, indeed, indoors. Newsom, you’re such a PASSUP. Don’t try to fool us, bro. You’re one of us! You should feel proud.
For your droll amusement, here’s a clip of his lying, rambling, hem-hawing apology:
Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, got her hair done at a beauty salon that should have been closed, but which she asked to open up just for her. And she wore no mask. Yep, she’s another PASSUP.
Philadelphia Mayor Jim Kenney was recently photographed dining indoors in a restaurant in Maryland. But that’s okay. While the mayor and his scientists in Philadelphia have banned indoor dining, the scientists in Maryland have determined that indoor dining won’t spread Covid.
Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot got a haircut during a statewide stay-at-home order. And after Biden apparently beat Trump, she mingled with a large crowd gathered in the Chicago streets, and encouraged celebrations. You’re such a PASSUP, Lori.
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo traveled to Georgia, where he gave a maskless elbow bump and two hugs to Savannah Mayor Van Johnson. Then he returned home and did not quarantine, even though his scientists have mandated that those who’ve been in Georgia must quarantine. So even the Emmy-Award winning governor is a PASSUP.
PASSUPs seem to run in Cuomo’s family. When Andrew’s brother, Chris Cuomo was quarantined after being diagnosed with Covid-19, Chris decided to travel from his home to inspect another home of his, which was under construction. But it’s all in keeping with his PASSUP family tradition.
Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer forbade all boating during the pandemic, because her scientists told her that you can spread Covid even while alone on a boat. But her PASSUP husband didn’t care, and tried to go boating anyway. I admire that in a henpecked husband.
Most recently, Denver Mayor Michael Hancock told Denverites to stay at home, cook a small turkey, and only celebrate Thanksgiving with those they live with. Then he promptly got on a plane to visit his daughter for the holidays. Way to go, mayor! That’s classic PASSUPerism.
If these very important people can be PASSUPs, we can be PASSUPs. They are wise enough to know their rules are ridiculous. And they apparently have just as little faith in their particular camarilla of scientists, as many of us apparently have.
So get out there and live life. Join the ever-expanding PASSUP resistance. Become one the secret rule violators/open rule praisers. If you’re not famous, or running a large medical organization, you have little to fear. You’re not likely to be photographed and held up to public scrutiny. You can be a PASSUP, and very likely get away with it.
The many ridiculous, idiotic, and tyrannical rules we’re told to follow, are all based upon science. Granted, it’s different science in different states but hey, it’s still science. So I’m all for these rules. I love science-based rules. I think they’re just dandy in our modern world, and I publicly vow to follow each and every one of them, to the letter.
Because I am a world-class PASSUP.
Categories: coronavirus
My one quibble is that President Trump has never paid any attention to a scientist.
LikeLiked by 4 people
Is it that, or does he handpick his favorites?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Gives new meaning to the term, “political science”.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, that’s for sure. They certainly seem to have taken the objectivity out of science, and filled it with political bias.
LikeLiked by 2 people
PASSUP…Another new term. Learn all kinds of words from your blog. 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yep. It’s one more word for your vastly expanding vocabulary.
LikeLiked by 3 people
You could make a post out of all your new vocab words. 🙂
Check your email when you have a chance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Maybe I will, one day.
Got it, and replied.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Replied back.
I will be looking for that post. You could add more new words too.
LikeLike
On a somewhat (irritatingly) serious note, and speaking as a “scientist”, the objective of science is to provide valid and useful data. Sometimes the data can be used to determine causal relationships… but most often just correlations. Scientists are not in charge of policy, nor should they be. Societies have to decide how to apply the data provided by scientists (and other experts) to meet social objectives, and that’s NOT science! Numerical efficiency can be applied to all kinds of ethical conundrums. But I don’t think most people would want to live a such a world.
If we could de-politicize science and receive honest data, and then have some frank presentations about how various policies in response will affect our society, I suspect that more people would agree upon a way forward. The alternative seems to be a collection of disjointed, knee-jerk reactions to whatever makes it into mass media.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I agree. I would especially prefer to see politicians make statements like, “SOME scientists have observed,” rather than, “Scientists say . . .” That leaves the door open for scientific debate over complex issues, rather than firmly-held, politically correct positions.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I don’t even agree with the “Some scientists observe…” thing. Scientists provide numbers… that’s all. Well done science results in accurate numbers, and they are what they are. The problem is in the interpretation of the numbers.
For example (and this is taken from some actual statistics), if a doctor told you that scientists have determined that taking a drug that would make you substantially less likely to suffer bone fractures and immune disorders while making you feel better has a side-effect of increasing the chance of heart attack by 50% and doubles your chance of a specific cancer, that doesn’t sound like a very good drug. But then looking at the actual data which involves 20,000 participants, you see that instead of five people having heart attacks in the control group, seven did when receiving the drug. And instead of two people being diagnosed with cancer, four did in the drug group. That means your odds of actually having a heart attack or developing that particular cancer yourself due to the drug increase by 1 in 10,000… and you find yourself filling a prescription. And this assumes that there were no other variables, such as obesity, poor diet, etc…
Try and find comprehensive statistics on the variables associated with Covid deaths. Spoiler alert! You won’t.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah, that makes sense. They’re not giving us enough data to make well-informed decisions, or to determine if our vaunted politicians are making well-informed decisions.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Like I’ve said before, I so look forward to your comments. Thank you.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Passups prove there are no rules Americans won’t refuse to follow — especially if they are the ones who wrote the rules. That’s one reason the pandemic is much worse here than other places.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yep. If the people who wrote the rules followed them, maybe more people would follow them. But they also have to be more consistent and make more sense, rather than hide behind the mysterious veil of so-called “science.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
I nearly peed on myself laughing at this. You have a firm grasp of the obvious. In our 24/7, technology-laden society, bullshit will float to the surface.
I’m definitely a PASSUP. When I get insanity spewed at me, I’ll smile…and nod. Then, I do what the fuck I want.
Science is just as polluted with politics as professional sports is. There are too many agendas and not enough common sense.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perhaps you should wear Depends when you read my blog. But yes, there are so many people with cameras these days, it’s hard to get away with anything. Our governor was recently reminded of that.
I’m glad to hear you’re a PASSUP. This country needs all the PASSUPs we can get, these days.
I think there are a lot of scientists who depend upon government grants. Therefore, they have keep government bureaucrats happy, in order to keep getting their grants. And so, they have to be politically correct and avoid being controversial by saying things like, “cloth masks really don’t work worth a damn.”
LikeLike
Heh. Funny you should mention that. I always giggle at the “Poise” commercials…”She’s got poise under pressure and poise in her pants.” I don’t need to know what someone has “in their pants”…thank you. squeal
I have to admit. Your governor is a bigger prick than ours. You win.
I remember reading years ago about the Sphinx. Egyptologists swore that said Sphinx could only be 4,500 years old, despite others protesting that the water damage on the back of it reflected a much older age. Those that said otherwise were threatened with their jobs. Once the “scientific” community determines something “is what it is”, it becomes chiseled in granite, even if new information becomes available. When people build careers on “speculation”, dissent cannot be allowed.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wow, what an honor. We win the biggest governor prick award. Whoopee!
Those scientist sound like pricks. May the curse of the Sphinx be upon them!
LikeLike
They even went so far as to re-surface the Sphinx, under the guise of saving it, to hide the water damage. If you can’t explain away the anomaly, cover it up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Were they ever caught?
LikeLike
It was done, openly, supported by the establishment. Other scientists objected but, it was done, anyway.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, drats.
LikeLike
I’m sure the others had more colorful language.
The biggest problems “science” has had regarding archeology, anthropology, egyptology, paleontology…and any other “ology”, where shit is dug up, is the Bible, Darwin, carbon dating and the misguided belief that today’s humans are the pinnacle of advanced society. If you have an existing framework that you are trying to work within and something doesn’t fit, it is usually ignored. If you protest, and have other ideas, you are automatically a scientific heretic and your career will be destroyed.
The most recent thing to rock the scientific world was the discovery of Gobekli Tepe in Turkey.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve heard that can be a weakness of scientist, when they fall into the trap of working inside an existing framework.
I’d never heard of Gobekli Tepe, so I looked it up. That’s an amazing archeological site. And to think, people were doing that stuff 10,000 years ago.
LikeLike
Humanity was far more advanced back then than we are now and far closer to Mother Earth. They worked with Earth, not against her. I watched a repeat of “What On Earth” on the Science Channel last night when they covered the discovery of Gobekli Tepe. All those high thinkers scratching their heads on how “primitive man” could make complex designs. Pffft. What arrogance.
Comfortable, modern life has generated warning labels on hair dryers because common sense has been bred out of people. We are, effectively, devolving into Neanderthals that destroy cities.
You want a unicorn? Search for a true polymath…not a tinkerer.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I wasn’t there 10,000 years ago. Maybe they more advanced, but I doubt anyone can say for sure. The best we can do is speculate.
I’m not sure if any generation is better than any other. I suspect each generation has had its good and bad points, all of which are subject to one’s personal judgments.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ever the diplomat. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, I know. One of my greatest inspirations was Charlie Brown.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My favorite is Linus. A pearl of young wisdom…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Although one for following blanket policies.
LikeLike
It’s for the security. 😉
Speaking of, I came to the conclusion months ago that mask wearing is a form of Linus’s blanket.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think it is. I’m wondering how many people will keep wearing masks after the pandemic ends. I bet there will be some.
LikeLike
I guarantee there will be.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We’ll be just like Japan, pre-Covid.
LikeLike
Hm. I’ll take your word for that. Were they wearing masks even before the lockdown here? I know China was.
LikeLiked by 1 person
From photos I’ve seen of Japanese crowds over the years, pre-Covid, I’ve noticed that quite often there’s at least one person in the crowd wearing a mask.
LikeLike
Wow. Ok. I think I will ask one of my group members about that.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Here’s an article from the Japan Times, about it:
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2020/07/04/national/science-health/japans-history-wearing-masks-coronavirus/
LikeLike
Yeah. Cultural stuff.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh my god, I can’t agree with you enough. I’m not sure which one to point out and comment, but let’s just say I keep nodding at everything… but to make it short “so many different rules, it all gets confusing” this is definitely one of the most annoying.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Yeah, and they can’t agree, from one jurisdiction to another, which rules to impose. So everything is different with each border and boundary crossing.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Perhaps off topic (“Polk” Salad notwithstanding), but I just finished watching the news from Taiwan with my husband. THIS is what functional democracy looks like:
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-taiwan-politics-idUKKBN2870GB
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ll bet they could balance their budget in Taiwan, if they sold tickets for people to come see the fights in their parliament.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d pay. And you could have a barbecue afterwards. As crazy as it looks, you can bet the media coverage in Taiwan will get people to notice how the government just passed legislation to kiss the US economic backside while contaminating their own food supply with an Eli Lilly product that’s been banned in 160 countries. Could you imagine any US politician ever having the guts (literally) to do something like that?
LikeLiked by 1 person
And here’s that “r” needed to increase the domain… letters falling on the floor again.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Okay, but I can’t figure out where to put that “r,” so there must be a typo in there that I didn’t notice.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“counties”… should be “countries”. I don’t think counties have the authority to ban FDA-approved pharmacological products.
LikeLike
He might have the guts if some Senator threw a gob at him.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Gotcha. I fixed it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I try not to be a PASSUP. This new term you’ve created came very close to one I’ve created with a very different meaning and intent. You may share it with your female followers any time. It’s how I refer to my about-to-be-ex-husband who most of my friends and even my mother know as the POSSOB. This term is composed of two acronyms that I imagine you know, but contact me if you don’t. POS+SOB=POSSOB
LikeLiked by 1 person
Let me guess. Piece of Shit Son of a Bitch.
Sorry your marriage didn’t work out. But I’m glad for you that you’re getting someone out of your life who is a POSSOB.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You got it right, of course, on both the acronym and the sentiment.
LikeLiked by 1 person