This is the next installment of my book, The Cultural Revolution: Then and Mao.
To read the previous installment, click this link.
To start at the beginning, click this link.
Chapter 12
First, the Landlords
Communism is established in countries as a dictatorship of the proletariat, when following pure Marxist doctrine. Dictatorships can only survive by suppressing their opposition. So there’s a measure of instability that comes with communism.
Mao Zedong was now the leader of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). But in order to maintain his leadership he would have to keep fighting for the “good cause.” And again, the end always justified the means, as far as this bloodthirsty tyrant was concerned.
The founding of the PRC in 1949 gave Mao the perfect excuse to unleash his cruelty upon the masses. He claimed he needed to secure the dictatorship of the proletariat.
At first he focused on landlords.

Even before the communists won, rich landlords found themselves under increasing threat, as evidenced by this photo of a farmer confronting a landowner in 1946.
Landlords had long been criticized and condemned by Chinese Communists as a major cause of poverty for peasants. So now that the PRC had been established, they were in some deep shit kind of trouble. Mao claimed that during the civil war, landowners had their chance to see the error of their ways, and that those who had not yet corrected their “excesses” would have to be dealt with.
But Mao felt reluctant to arrest landowners, and imprison or execute them at the hands of the state. He preferred landless peasants to do at least some of this dirty work. He wanted them to actively take part in the purging process, rather than be passive observers. He reasoned that in this way, ordinary folks would tie themselves to the revolution, wet their hands with blood, and thus become co-conspirators with him.
He made it clear to the people that landlords had no protection from the law, and that the state would not step in to interfere with any retribution anyone wanted to exact upon those who owned land. And that’s all the peasants needed to hear.
What followed was a bloodbath at the hands of mobs all over China. Landlords were hunted down, condemned by vigilantes, and executed in a variety of cruel ways. Some were buried alive, others were dismembered or strangled. The lucky ones were shot.
Struggle sessions became popular at this time. In these events, a landlord was put on display before a mob, while a speaker humiliated him or her by accusing the victim of many despicable crimes against the people, whether real or imagined. Then the victim would be thrown to the mob to be beaten, often to death.
Scholars estimate that up to five million people were executed by mobs in China, between 1949 and 1953. Millions more were sent to labor camps, where many perished. Mao’s pain was manifesting on a mass scale, and many millions were coming to understand him, under the cruelest circumstances possible.
Come on back in a few days for the next installment, entitled Chapter 13: Killing Campaigns.
Categories: Series (History): The Cultural Revolution
I wonder if landlords in the U.S. are getting worried about tenants not paying, and not being able to evict them…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve been wondering about that myself. A few years ago, my wife inherited some rentals. I urged her to sell them. She did, and we’re very glad about that now.
There doesn’t seem to be any economic relief for landlords, and every politician, on both the left and right, seems ready and willing to shit on them without a second thought.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is odd that no one seems to care that landlords have to earn money, through rent, to feed their families…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not only that, but they have overhead. They have to maintain the properties they rent out, pay property taxes, insurance, etc. In fact, there’s not much month-to-month net profit. The real profit comes from the capital gains, when you finally sell your rental.
LikeLiked by 1 person
it’s a tough job, and even tougher now. and not very fair…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Nope. And yet I see very little in the news about landlords. They seem to be the forgotten victims in this crisis.
LikeLiked by 1 person
and even worse, they seem to be made out to be the villains…
LikeLiked by 2 people
Oh yeah. Landlords are an easy target, and always have been.
LikeLiked by 2 people
like most things, a few bad ones hurt the reputation of all of them…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Eric Hoffer, in The True Believer” wrote that, “Mass movements can occur and spread without belief in God, but not without belief in a devil.” He felt that “foreigners” were the most frequent “devils”. In civil conflicts however, landlords seem to be a common stand in (especially if they can be labeled as “foreign”). Land redistribution schemes are a quick way to provide plunder for masses of poor fighters without actually having to do or produce anything… almost a hallmark of incompetent and corrupt leadership. Inevitably ends up resulting in agricultural collapse… Soviet Ukraine, North Vietnam, Cuba, Zimbabwe, South Africa, Venezuela, soon Namibia… and China of course.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s interesting. I guess landlords would be an easy target, since the land is already there for the taking. Maybe that’s why politicians in the U.S., on both the left and right, are all for eviction moratoriums right now. They get to look like heroes, and to hell with the landlords, who most people don’t like anyway.
LikeLiked by 1 person
So did Mao really feel less guilty by getting others to do his dirty work! “Dismemberment, strangulation…” what happened to the large feather?
LikeLiked by 2 people
I don’t think it was a matter of feeling guilty. He just wanted ordinary citizens to have some blood on their hands, too. Perhaps that way they’d be less inclined to condemn him for his atrocities.
It is reported that up to 900,000 landlords were tickled to death by large feathers, during this period.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I could see him thinking that way.
Thank you! If only all battles could be solved by feathers. Would be 1 much more peaceful! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
In Vietnam, the Maoist-style land redistribution got completely out of control. Anyone who even lived in a shack became a potential target of random mobs. Probably about 100,000 people were subject to mob-execution. Then in 1957, the party admitted there’d been some “mistakes”, and eventually decided that about 70% of those labeled as “landlords” had been designated in error. Oops.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh my gosh! Thats a really bad “OOPS!”
LikeLiked by 2 people
The 1957 Vietnamese Communist Party campaign to fix their land-reform mistakes was known as the, “Rectification of Errors”. I always wondered how one “rectifies” an execution?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Great question!
Sadly there have been many on death row in prisons that are innocent that have been executed.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Wow, that’s sad. It’s difficult to reason with a mob, so I doubt very many targets got a chance to plead their case.
LikeLiked by 2 people
This link goes to a very lengthy article on the US today, and makes for interesting perspectives …especially with you doing this series on China.
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/political-commentary/covid-19-end-of-american-era-wade-davis-1038206/
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re right, it’s very lengthy. I skimmed through most of it. Basically, the message seems to be, America is doomed. We’re going down the toilet, and China will be the next overmaster of the world.
Maybe so. Who the hell knows? Everyone was saying the stock market was doomed, back in March, and now it’s back to near pre-Covid heights.
If there’s one thing I’ve learned, predicting things like politics or the economy is very iffy business. I’ve dabbled in prediction myself, usually with mixed results, and rarely with great results.
So I feel skeptical about this article, or about any other predictions of America’s demise or future greatness. I think we’ll all just have to wait and see.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I agree that predicting the future is a risky business, but one can certainly recount recent history and draw some reasonable conclusions.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Trump seems corrupt in a number of ways, and corruption does weaken any nation. So yes, we can expect some bad karma from that. On the other hand, I think we still have a robust media and checks and balances in our government, that can prevent him from going to an extreme. I wouldn’t count America out so quickly, even if Trump is reelected.
LikeLiked by 1 person